Poof! You have $70 million
There's a fascinating discussion going on over at The Chronicle of Philanthropy's Blog Give and Take in response to an anonymous 31-year-old philanthropist's request for advice on where to donate $70 million. The original request was found on the New York Times' Freakonomic's blog where it received over 500 responses, some serious, some involving marriage proposals. One response in particular caught the eye of the Give and Take blogger though and has me thinking too. It came from Jack B. Siegel, a nonprofit lawyer and author of Charity Governance blog, who suggested that the philanthropist should, "cool his jets." Give and Take explains:
Mr. Siegel writes that the 31-year-old has his entire life to be a
philanthropist and that he shouldn’t be too hasty with his giving.
What do you think? If the need is there now should he wait? Is there a false assumption here that a young philanthropist is inherently a less mature philanthropist? Would it be better to wait for several years when that money, wisely invested, could grow to an even greater sum? It seems to be important to the donor to invest large sums of it all at once to make a bigger impact. What do you think about this approach versus smaller donations over time?



Although my gut reaction is
Although my gut reaction is to say to this person, "Hey, invest it in a medium-sized United Way near the foothills of the Smoky Mountains here in Blount County, TN," my analytical skills make me think otherwise.
Giving all of that money in one big dump could be disastrous for whatever organization gets a hold of it, especially if it's not ready to handle it.
Then again, we'd love to have a $70 million donation fall in our laps. :)
All the best,
~Aaron~
Post new comment